Scope and best-fit use
Use this prompt when the primary goal is search discoverability and page-level SEO readiness. It does not guarantee ranking or replace Search Console data.
Inputs required
Provide the page, template, metadata, URL, sitemap, internal-link context, and target search intent when available. Do not infer live indexing, ranking, or Search Console status without evidence.
Copy-ready prompt
Copy the prompt and replace the MATERIALS block with the page, metadata, templates, sitemap data, internal-link context, and search-intent notes.
Review SEO discoverability and indexing readiness.
TASK:
Audit the supplied page, template, metadata, or site material for search discoverability, indexing readiness, metadata clarity, internal linking, structured page hierarchy, and structured-data readiness where relevant.
REVIEW SCOPE:
Focus on:
- crawl/indexing signals visible in the supplied material
- sitemap and canonical URL coverage when supplied
- title and meta description quality
- H1/H2/H3 hierarchy and page structure
- internal linking and orphan-page risk
- URL clarity and page purpose
- structured data only when relevant and supplied
- visible mismatch between page copy and intended search intent
EVIDENCE RULES:
- Base findings only on supplied material, live URLs you can access, or cited official documentation.
- Do not claim that a page is indexed unless Search Console data, live search evidence, or another explicit source is supplied.
- Do not guarantee ranking, traffic, impressions, clicks, or indexing.
- If a finding requires sitemap, robots.txt, Search Console, analytics, or live crawl evidence that is not supplied, mark it NOT VERIFIED.
- If you use external sources, cite official documentation where possible.
- Separate confirmed findings from evidence gaps.
CHECKS:
- Is the page purpose clear?
- Is there one clear primary title/H1?
- Are title and meta description specific, descriptive, and non-duplicative?
- Is the page hierarchy scannable and logically nested?
- Are related pages linked internally?
- Is the page reachable from relevant navigation, topic, guide, prompt, article, or index surfaces?
- Are canonical URL and sitemap signals supplied and consistent?
- Are robots or noindex blockers visible in the supplied material?
- Is structured data present only where it has a clear page-type fit?
- Are there missing SEO metadata fields that should be added before publishing?
OUTPUT:
A) Executive finding
B) Confirmed SEO blockers
C) Metadata fixes
D) Page hierarchy fixes
E) Internal-linking fixes
F) Sitemap / canonical / indexing checks
G) Structured-data notes, only if relevant
H) Exact recommended changes
I) NOT VERIFIED / missing evidence
J) Confidence
MATERIALS:
"""
Replace this block with:
- page URL or page content
- title and meta description
- headings
- internal links
- sitemap/canonical/robots evidence, if available
- target audience and search intent
- related pages or topic hierarchy
- current concern or recent change
"""
Use this as a runtime SEO review prompt
Paste the page, metadata, template, sitemap evidence, and search-intent context into the prompt. Keep reusable evidence and citation rules in the instruction layer.